Does physiotherapy research in South Korea match international best-practice osteoarthritis guidelines? A narrative review

Authors

  • Mi La Park Auckland of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand https://orcid.org/0009-0002-4056-0005
  • Nico Magni Department of Physiotherapy, School of Clinical Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8140-3001
  • Daniel W. O'Brien Department of Physiotherapy; Active Living and Rehabilitation: Aotearoa New Zealand, Health and Rehabilitation Research Institute, School of Clinical Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2513-6011

Keywords:

Culture, Guidelines, Motivation, Osteoarthritis, South Korea

Abstract

The aim of this study was to explore physiotherapy-based osteoarthritis (OA) research conducted in South Korea, with a focus on the utilisation of conservative management, and to assess its alignment with international clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). Databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and SPORTDiscus – accessed via EBSCOhost) and Google Scholar were searched to identify clinical articles and trials focused on research related to OA management in physiotherapy conducted in South Korea. A total of 11 studies met the inclusion criteria, with nine being randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and one utilising a prospective design and one a quasi-experimental approach. These studies employed various interventions such as kinesiology tape (KT), electrotherapies, and exercise. None of the studies implemented education, self-management, and weight control as management. There is a discrepancy between research-based physiotherapy for OA management in South Korea and international CPGs. These findings may be explained by factors such as education, healthcare systems, and cultural differences.

Downloads

Published

28-03-2024

How to Cite

Park, M. L., Magni, N., & O’Brien, D. W. (2024). Does physiotherapy research in South Korea match international best-practice osteoarthritis guidelines? A narrative review. New Zealand Journal of Physiotherapy, 52(1), 52–61. Retrieved from https://nzjp.org.nz/nzjp/article/view/362